Dapper vs NHibernate

Developers should use Dapper when they need fast database access with minimal abstraction, such as in high-performance web applications, microservices, or scenarios where raw SQL control is preferred meets developers should learn nhibernate when building . Here's our take.

Dapper

Nice Pick

Developers should use Dapper when they need fast database access with minimal abstraction, such as in high-performance web applications, microservices, or scenarios where raw SQL control is preferred

Pros

• It's ideal for projects requiring simple CRUD operations, complex queries, or when integrating with existing SQL-heavy codebases, as it reduces boilerplate while maintaining SQL transparency
• Related to: c-sharp, sql-server

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

NHibernate

Developers should learn NHibernate when building

Pros

• NET applications that require complex data models and database interactions, as it simplifies data access by eliminating much of the boilerplate SQL code
• Related to: c-sharp, object-relational-mapping

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Dapper is a library while NHibernate is a framework. We picked Dapper based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Dapper wins

Based on overall popularity. Dapper is more widely used, but NHibernate excels in its own space.