Decorator Pattern vs Proxy Pattern

Developers should learn the Decorator Pattern when they need to add responsibilities to objects at runtime without modifying existing code, such as in GUI toolkits, I/O streams, or middleware systems meets developers should learn and use the proxy pattern when they need to add a layer of control or enhancement to object access, such as in scenarios requiring lazy loading of heavy resources (e. Here's our take.

Decorator Pattern

Nice Pick

Developers should learn the Decorator Pattern when they need to add responsibilities to objects at runtime without modifying existing code, such as in GUI toolkits, I/O streams, or middleware systems

Pros

• It's particularly valuable in scenarios where multiple independent features might be combined, like adding logging, encryption, or compression to data streams, as it promotes the Open/Closed Principle by allowing extension without modification
• Related to: design-patterns, object-oriented-programming

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Proxy Pattern

Developers should learn and use the Proxy Pattern when they need to add a layer of control or enhancement to object access, such as in scenarios requiring lazy loading of heavy resources (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: design-patterns, structural-patterns

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Decorator Pattern if: You want it's particularly valuable in scenarios where multiple independent features might be combined, like adding logging, encryption, or compression to data streams, as it promotes the open/closed principle by allowing extension without modification and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Proxy Pattern if: You prioritize g over what Decorator Pattern offers.

The Bottom Line

Decorator Pattern wins

Developers should learn the Decorator Pattern when they need to add responsibilities to objects at runtime without modifying existing code, such as in GUI toolkits, I/O streams, or middleware systems