Desktop-Only Design vs Adaptive Design

Developers should use desktop-only design when building applications that require extensive screen space, precise input controls (e meets developers should use adaptive design when targeting specific devices with known screen sizes, such as in mobile-first strategies or for applications requiring highly optimized performance on particular platforms. Here's our take.

Desktop-Only Design

Nice Pick

Developers should use desktop-only design when building applications that require extensive screen space, precise input controls (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: responsive-web-design, user-interface-design

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Adaptive Design

Developers should use Adaptive Design when targeting specific devices with known screen sizes, such as in mobile-first strategies or for applications requiring highly optimized performance on particular platforms

Pros

• It is particularly useful for complex web applications where fluid responsiveness might not provide sufficient control over layout and user interactions, such as in e-commerce sites or enterprise software with distinct mobile and desktop versions
• Related to: responsive-web-design, css-media-queries

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Desktop-Only Design is a methodology while Adaptive Design is a concept. We picked Desktop-Only Design based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Desktop-Only Design wins

Based on overall popularity. Desktop-Only Design is more widely used, but Adaptive Design excels in its own space.