Desktop-Only Design vs Responsive Design
Developers should use desktop-only design when building applications that require extensive screen space, precise input controls (e meets developers should learn and implement responsive design to build websites that work effectively on the vast array of devices used today, from mobile phones to large desktop monitors, improving user engagement and reducing bounce rates. Here's our take.
Desktop-Only Design
Developers should use desktop-only design when building applications that require extensive screen space, precise input controls (e
Desktop-Only Design
Nice PickDevelopers should use desktop-only design when building applications that require extensive screen space, precise input controls (e
Pros
- +g
- +Related to: responsive-web-design, user-interface-design
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Responsive Design
Developers should learn and implement Responsive Design to build websites that work effectively on the vast array of devices used today, from mobile phones to large desktop monitors, improving user engagement and reducing bounce rates
Pros
- +It is essential for modern web development as it supports SEO (search engines like Google prioritize mobile-friendly sites) and meets accessibility standards, making content usable for people with disabilities
- +Related to: css-media-queries, flexbox
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
These tools serve different purposes. Desktop-Only Design is a methodology while Responsive Design is a concept. We picked Desktop-Only Design based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.
Based on overall popularity. Desktop-Only Design is more widely used, but Responsive Design excels in its own space.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev