Digital Signatures vs HMAC

Developers should learn digital signatures when building systems requiring data integrity, non-repudiation, or authentication, such as in secure APIs, blockchain transactions, or document signing applications meets developers should learn hmac when building secure applications that require message authentication, such as in api authentication (e. Here's our take.

Digital Signatures

Nice Pick

Developers should learn digital signatures when building systems requiring data integrity, non-repudiation, or authentication, such as in secure APIs, blockchain transactions, or document signing applications

Pros

• They are essential for compliance with security standards like GDPR or HIPAA, and for implementing features like code signing in software releases to prevent malware distribution
• Related to: public-key-infrastructure, cryptography

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

HMAC

Developers should learn HMAC when building secure applications that require message authentication, such as in API authentication (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: cryptography, api-authentication

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Digital Signatures if: You want they are essential for compliance with security standards like gdpr or hipaa, and for implementing features like code signing in software releases to prevent malware distribution and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use HMAC if: You prioritize g over what Digital Signatures offers.

The Bottom Line

Digital Signatures wins

Developers should learn digital signatures when building systems requiring data integrity, non-repudiation, or authentication, such as in secure APIs, blockchain transactions, or document signing applications