DO-178C vs IEC 61508
Developers should learn and use DO-178C when working on safety-critical software for airborne systems, such as flight control, navigation, or engine management software in aircraft, where failure could lead to catastrophic outcomes meets developers should learn and use iec 61508 when working on safety-critical systems in industries like automotive, aerospace, medical devices, or industrial automation, where failures could lead to harm to people or the environment. Here's our take.
DO-178C
Developers should learn and use DO-178C when working on safety-critical software for airborne systems, such as flight control, navigation, or engine management software in aircraft, where failure could lead to catastrophic outcomes
DO-178C
Nice PickDevelopers should learn and use DO-178C when working on safety-critical software for airborne systems, such as flight control, navigation, or engine management software in aircraft, where failure could lead to catastrophic outcomes
Pros
- +It is essential for achieving regulatory certification in the aviation industry, as it provides a structured framework to demonstrate software reliability and traceability throughout the development lifecycle
- +Related to: safety-critical-software, avionics-software
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
IEC 61508
Developers should learn and use IEC 61508 when working on safety-critical systems in industries like automotive, aerospace, medical devices, or industrial automation, where failures could lead to harm to people or the environment
Pros
- +It is essential for ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements and for designing reliable systems that mitigate risks through systematic processes, such as hazard analysis and safety validation
- +Related to: functional-safety, safety-integrity-level
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
Use DO-178C if: You want it is essential for achieving regulatory certification in the aviation industry, as it provides a structured framework to demonstrate software reliability and traceability throughout the development lifecycle and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.
Use IEC 61508 if: You prioritize it is essential for ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements and for designing reliable systems that mitigate risks through systematic processes, such as hazard analysis and safety validation over what DO-178C offers.
Developers should learn and use DO-178C when working on safety-critical software for airborne systems, such as flight control, navigation, or engine management software in aircraft, where failure could lead to catastrophic outcomes
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev