Documentation As Code vs Word Processor

Developers should adopt Documentation As Code when working in agile or DevOps environments to maintain accurate, version-controlled documentation that evolves with the codebase meets developers should learn to use word processors for creating technical documentation, writing project proposals, and drafting user manuals, as clear communication is crucial in software development. Here's our take.

Documentation As Code

Nice Pick

Developers should adopt Documentation As Code when working in agile or DevOps environments to maintain accurate, version-controlled documentation that evolves with the codebase

Pros

• It's particularly useful for API documentation, technical guides, and project wikis, as it reduces documentation drift, facilitates team collaboration through pull requests, and supports continuous integration/deployment pipelines for automated publishing
• Related to: git, markdown

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Word Processor

Developers should learn to use word processors for creating technical documentation, writing project proposals, and drafting user manuals, as clear communication is crucial in software development

Pros

• They are also useful for preparing resumes, cover letters, and internal reports, helping developers present their work professionally and collaborate effectively with non-technical stakeholders
• Related to: technical-writing, documentation

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Documentation As Code is a methodology while Word Processor is a tool. We picked Documentation As Code based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Documentation As Code wins

Based on overall popularity. Documentation As Code is more widely used, but Word Processor excels in its own space.