Dynamic

Dots vs Underscore.js

Developers should learn about dots because they are ubiquitous in coding, appearing in file paths (e meets developers should learn underscore. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Dots

Developers should learn about dots because they are ubiquitous in coding, appearing in file paths (e

Dots

Nice Pick

Developers should learn about dots because they are ubiquitous in coding, appearing in file paths (e

Pros

  • +g
  • +Related to: regular-expressions, file-systems

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Underscore.js

Developers should learn Underscore

Pros

  • +js when working on legacy codebases or projects that rely on its utilities for functional programming patterns
  • +Related to: javascript, functional-programming

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Dots is a concept while Underscore.js is a library. We picked Dots based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Dots wins

Based on overall popularity. Dots is more widely used, but Underscore.js excels in its own space.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev