Dynamic
Dots vs Underscore.js
Developers should learn about dots because they are ubiquitous in coding, appearing in file paths (e meets developers should learn underscore. Here's our take.
🧊Nice Pick
Dots
Developers should learn about dots because they are ubiquitous in coding, appearing in file paths (e
Dots
Nice PickDevelopers should learn about dots because they are ubiquitous in coding, appearing in file paths (e
Pros
- +g
- +Related to: regular-expressions, file-systems
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Underscore.js
Developers should learn Underscore
Pros
- +js when working on legacy codebases or projects that rely on its utilities for functional programming patterns
- +Related to: javascript, functional-programming
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
These tools serve different purposes. Dots is a concept while Underscore.js is a library. We picked Dots based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.
🧊
The Bottom Line
Dots wins
Based on overall popularity. Dots is more widely used, but Underscore.js excels in its own space.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev