DRY Principle vs Wet Principle

Developers should apply the DRY principle to reduce code duplication, which simplifies maintenance, debugging, and updates by ensuring changes only need to be made in one place meets developers should apply the wet principle when working on projects where requirements are evolving rapidly or when the cost of premature abstraction (e. Here's our take.

DRY Principle

Nice Pick

Developers should apply the DRY principle to reduce code duplication, which simplifies maintenance, debugging, and updates by ensuring changes only need to be made in one place

Pros

• It is particularly useful in large-scale projects, refactoring efforts, and when building reusable components or libraries to enhance consistency and efficiency
• Related to: software-design-patterns, code-refactoring

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Wet Principle

Developers should apply the Wet Principle when working on projects where requirements are evolving rapidly or when the cost of premature abstraction (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: dry-principle, refactoring

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. DRY Principle is a concept while Wet Principle is a methodology. We picked DRY Principle based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

DRY Principle wins

Based on overall popularity. DRY Principle is more widely used, but Wet Principle excels in its own space.