Dynamic CMS vs Static Site Generator

Developers should learn Dynamic CMS when building content-heavy websites that require frequent updates, such as blogs, news portals, or corporate sites, as it streamlines content creation and reduces development time meets developers should use a static site generator when building fast, secure, and scalable websites with predictable content, as it eliminates server-side rendering overhead and reduces vulnerabilities compared to dynamic sites. Here's our take.

Dynamic CMS

Nice Pick

Developers should learn Dynamic CMS when building content-heavy websites that require frequent updates, such as blogs, news portals, or corporate sites, as it streamlines content creation and reduces development time

Pros

• It's also valuable for projects where non-technical users need to manage content independently, enhancing collaboration and scalability
• Related to: wordpress, drupal

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Static Site Generator

Developers should use a Static Site Generator when building fast, secure, and scalable websites with predictable content, as it eliminates server-side rendering overhead and reduces vulnerabilities compared to dynamic sites

Pros

• It's ideal for projects like blogs, documentation, or landing pages where performance and simplicity are priorities, and it integrates well with modern workflows using version control and headless CMSs
• Related to: jamstack, markdown

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Dynamic CMS is a platform while Static Site Generator is a tool. We picked Dynamic CMS based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Dynamic CMS wins

Based on overall popularity. Dynamic CMS is more widely used, but Static Site Generator excels in its own space.