Dynamic Import vs CommonJS

Developers should use Dynamic Import to optimize web applications by reducing initial bundle sizes and improving load times, especially for large single-page applications (SPAs) or features that are not immediately required meets developers should learn commonjs when working with node. Here's our take.

Dynamic Import

Nice Pick

Developers should use Dynamic Import to optimize web applications by reducing initial bundle sizes and improving load times, especially for large single-page applications (SPAs) or features that are not immediately required

Pros

• It's essential for implementing lazy loading of routes, components, or libraries in frameworks like React, Vue, or Angular, and for conditionally loading polyfills or modules based on user interactions or device capabilities
• Related to: javascript, es-modules

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

CommonJS

Developers should learn CommonJS when working with Node

Pros

• js or older JavaScript projects, as it was the default module system in Node
• Related to: node-js, javascript

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Dynamic Import if: You want it's essential for implementing lazy loading of routes, components, or libraries in frameworks like react, vue, or angular, and for conditionally loading polyfills or modules based on user interactions or device capabilities and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use CommonJS if: You prioritize js or older javascript projects, as it was the default module system in node over what Dynamic Import offers.

The Bottom Line

Dynamic Import wins

Developers should use Dynamic Import to optimize web applications by reducing initial bundle sizes and improving load times, especially for large single-page applications (SPAs) or features that are not immediately required