Dynamic

Dynamic Imports vs CommonJS

Developers should use dynamic imports to optimize web applications by splitting code into smaller chunks that load only when needed, such as for route-based or feature-based lazy loading meets developers should learn commonjs when working with node. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Dynamic Imports

Developers should use dynamic imports to optimize web applications by splitting code into smaller chunks that load only when needed, such as for route-based or feature-based lazy loading

Dynamic Imports

Nice Pick

Developers should use dynamic imports to optimize web applications by splitting code into smaller chunks that load only when needed, such as for route-based or feature-based lazy loading

Pros

  • +This is crucial for large-scale applications to reduce initial load times, improve user experience, and manage bandwidth efficiently, especially in environments with limited resources like mobile devices
  • +Related to: javascript, webpack

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

CommonJS

Developers should learn CommonJS when working with Node

Pros

  • +js or older JavaScript projects, as it was the default module system in Node
  • +Related to: node-js, javascript

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Dynamic Imports if: You want this is crucial for large-scale applications to reduce initial load times, improve user experience, and manage bandwidth efficiently, especially in environments with limited resources like mobile devices and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use CommonJS if: You prioritize js or older javascript projects, as it was the default module system in node over what Dynamic Imports offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Dynamic Imports wins

Developers should use dynamic imports to optimize web applications by splitting code into smaller chunks that load only when needed, such as for route-based or feature-based lazy loading

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev