Dynamic Linking vs Monolithic Applications
Developers should use dynamic linking when building modular applications that require efficient memory usage, easy updates, or plugin architectures, such as in large-scale desktop software, operating systems, or applications with frequent library updates meets developers should consider monolithic applications for small to medium-sized projects where simplicity, rapid development, and ease of deployment are priorities, such as in startups or proof-of-concept applications. Here's our take.
Dynamic Linking
Developers should use dynamic linking when building modular applications that require efficient memory usage, easy updates, or plugin architectures, such as in large-scale desktop software, operating systems, or applications with frequent library updates
Dynamic Linking
Nice PickDevelopers should use dynamic linking when building modular applications that require efficient memory usage, easy updates, or plugin architectures, such as in large-scale desktop software, operating systems, or applications with frequent library updates
Pros
- +It's essential for scenarios where multiple programs need to share the same library code, reducing disk space and memory footprint compared to static linking
- +Related to: static-linking, shared-libraries
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Monolithic Applications
Developers should consider monolithic applications for small to medium-sized projects where simplicity, rapid development, and ease of deployment are priorities, such as in startups or proof-of-concept applications
Pros
- +This architecture is also suitable when the team is small and the application has predictable, low-traffic requirements, as it avoids the overhead of distributed systems
- +Related to: microservices, service-oriented-architecture
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
Use Dynamic Linking if: You want it's essential for scenarios where multiple programs need to share the same library code, reducing disk space and memory footprint compared to static linking and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.
Use Monolithic Applications if: You prioritize this architecture is also suitable when the team is small and the application has predictable, low-traffic requirements, as it avoids the overhead of distributed systems over what Dynamic Linking offers.
Developers should use dynamic linking when building modular applications that require efficient memory usage, easy updates, or plugin architectures, such as in large-scale desktop software, operating systems, or applications with frequent library updates
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev