Dynamic Rendering vs Static Site Generation

Developers should use dynamic rendering when building single-page applications (SPAs) with frameworks like React, Angular, or Vue that rely heavily on client-side JavaScript, as search engines may struggle to index such content meets developers should use ssg for content-heavy sites like blogs, documentation, portfolios, and marketing pages where content changes infrequently, as it offers superior performance, security (no server-side vulnerabilities), and low hosting costs. Here's our take.

Dynamic Rendering

Nice Pick

Developers should use dynamic rendering when building single-page applications (SPAs) with frameworks like React, Angular, or Vue that rely heavily on client-side JavaScript, as search engines may struggle to index such content

Pros

• It's particularly useful for content that changes frequently or requires real-time data, where server-side rendering might be too resource-intensive
• Related to: server-side-rendering, client-side-rendering

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Static Site Generation

Developers should use SSG for content-heavy sites like blogs, documentation, portfolios, and marketing pages where content changes infrequently, as it offers superior performance, security (no server-side vulnerabilities), and low hosting costs

Pros

• It's ideal for projects requiring SEO optimization, global scalability via CDNs, and simplified deployment workflows, especially when combined with modern frameworks like Next
• Related to: next-js, gatsby

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Dynamic Rendering is a concept while Static Site Generation is a methodology. We picked Dynamic Rendering based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Dynamic Rendering wins

Based on overall popularity. Dynamic Rendering is more widely used, but Static Site Generation excels in its own space.