DynamoDB vs MongoDB
AWS's NoSQL powerhouse that scales like a dream but makes you think in keys and indexes meets the database for when you want to store json and pretend it's a schema. Here's our take.
DynamoDB
AWS's NoSQL powerhouse that scales like a dream but makes you think in keys and indexes.
DynamoDB
Nice PickAWS's NoSQL powerhouse that scales like a dream but makes you think in keys and indexes.
Pros
- +Serverless architecture with automatic scaling
- +Single-digit millisecond latency for most operations
- +Built-in backup and point-in-time recovery
- +Seamless integration with other AWS services
Cons
- -Pricing can be unpredictable with high throughput
- -Limited query flexibility compared to relational databases
MongoDB
The database for when you want to store JSON and pretend it's a schema.
Pros
- +Flexible schema allows rapid prototyping and iteration
- +Native JSON-like document storage fits well with modern web apps
- +Horizontal scaling with sharding is straightforward
- +Aggregation pipeline is powerful for complex queries
Cons
- -Lack of enforced schema can lead to messy data over time
- -Joins are clunky compared to relational databases
The Verdict
Use DynamoDB if: You want serverless architecture with automatic scaling and can live with pricing can be unpredictable with high throughput.
Use MongoDB if: You prioritize flexible schema allows rapid prototyping and iteration over what DynamoDB offers.
AWS's NoSQL powerhouse that scales like a dream but makes you think in keys and indexes.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev