Dynamic

EJS vs Mustache

Developers should learn EJS when building server-rendered web applications with Node meets developers should use mustache when they need a simple, cross-platform templating solution for web applications, configuration files, or documentation generation, as it enforces separation of concerns and reduces complexity. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

EJS

Developers should learn EJS when building server-rendered web applications with Node

EJS

Nice Pick

Developers should learn EJS when building server-rendered web applications with Node

Pros

  • +js, as it provides an easy way to create dynamic HTML content without complex syntax
  • +Related to: node-js, express-js

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Mustache

Developers should use Mustache when they need a simple, cross-platform templating solution for web applications, configuration files, or documentation generation, as it enforces separation of concerns and reduces complexity

Pros

  • +It is ideal for projects where templates must be shared across different programming environments or when minimal logic in templates is preferred to avoid security risks and improve maintainability
  • +Related to: handlebars, jinja2

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. EJS is a template engine while Mustache is a template. We picked EJS based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

🧊
The Bottom Line
EJS wins

Based on overall popularity. EJS is more widely used, but Mustache excels in its own space.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev