Elastic APM vs New Relic

Developers should use Elastic APM when building or maintaining applications that require performance monitoring, especially in microservices or distributed systems where debugging can be complex meets developers should use new relic when building or maintaining applications that require high availability, performance optimization, and proactive issue detection, such as in e-commerce, saas, or microservices architectures. Here's our take.

Elastic APM

Nice Pick

Developers should use Elastic APM when building or maintaining applications that require performance monitoring, especially in microservices or distributed systems where debugging can be complex

Pros

• It helps identify bottlenecks, reduce latency, and improve reliability by providing detailed traces and metrics
• Related to: elasticsearch, kibana

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

New Relic

Developers should use New Relic when building or maintaining applications that require high availability, performance optimization, and proactive issue detection, such as in e-commerce, SaaS, or microservices architectures

Pros

• It is particularly valuable for teams adopting DevOps practices, as it integrates with CI/CD pipelines and provides actionable insights to reduce mean time to resolution (MTTR) and improve user experience through features like APM, infrastructure monitoring, and AI-powered alerts
• Related to: application-performance-monitoring, observability

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Elastic APM is a tool while New Relic is a platform. We picked Elastic APM based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Elastic APM wins

Based on overall popularity. Elastic APM is more widely used, but New Relic excels in its own space.