EN 13480 vs ISO 15649

Developers should learn EN 13480 when working on engineering software, simulation tools, or compliance systems for industrial piping in Europe, as it ensures designs meet legal safety requirements and industry best practices meets developers should learn iso 15649 when involved in projects related to industrial piping systems, particularly in the petroleum and natural gas industries, to ensure compliance with safety regulations and industry best practices. Here's our take.

EN 13480

Nice Pick

Developers should learn EN 13480 when working on engineering software, simulation tools, or compliance systems for industrial piping in Europe, as it ensures designs meet legal safety requirements and industry best practices

Pros

• It is essential for roles in mechanical engineering, plant design, or regulatory compliance software development, particularly for projects involving pressure equipment, risk assessment, or automated design validation in process industries
• Related to: pressure-equipment-directive, asme-b31-3

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

ISO 15649

Developers should learn ISO 15649 when involved in projects related to industrial piping systems, particularly in the petroleum and natural gas industries, to ensure compliance with safety regulations and industry best practices

Pros

• It is crucial for roles in engineering design, quality assurance, and project management where adherence to international standards reduces risks of failures and accidents
• Related to: piping-design, safety-standards

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. EN 13480 is a concept while ISO 15649 is a methodology. We picked EN 13480 based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

EN 13480 wins

Based on overall popularity. EN 13480 is more widely used, but ISO 15649 excels in its own space.