EN 301 549 vs ISO 9241-171
Developers should learn and use EN 301 549 when creating ICT products or services for the European market, especially for public sector projects where compliance is legally required meets developers should learn and apply iso 9241-171 when building software that must comply with accessibility laws (e. Here's our take.
EN 301 549
Developers should learn and use EN 301 549 when creating ICT products or services for the European market, especially for public sector projects where compliance is legally required
EN 301 549
Nice PickDevelopers should learn and use EN 301 549 when creating ICT products or services for the European market, especially for public sector projects where compliance is legally required
Pros
- +It is essential for ensuring that applications, websites, and devices are accessible to all users, reducing legal risks and improving user experience
- +Related to: web-content-accessibility-guidelines, accessibility-testing
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
ISO 9241-171
Developers should learn and apply ISO 9241-171 when building software that must comply with accessibility laws (e
Pros
- +g
- +Related to: web-accessibility, wcag
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
Use EN 301 549 if: You want it is essential for ensuring that applications, websites, and devices are accessible to all users, reducing legal risks and improving user experience and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.
Use ISO 9241-171 if: You prioritize g over what EN 301 549 offers.
Developers should learn and use EN 301 549 when creating ICT products or services for the European market, especially for public sector projects where compliance is legally required
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev