External Regulation vs Voluntary Standards
Developers should learn about external regulation to build compliant and secure software in industries with strict legal requirements, such as finance (e meets developers should learn and use voluntary standards to ensure compatibility, reduce technical debt, and enhance product reliability in collaborative or regulated environments. Here's our take.
External Regulation
Developers should learn about external regulation to build compliant and secure software in industries with strict legal requirements, such as finance (e
External Regulation
Nice PickDevelopers should learn about external regulation to build compliant and secure software in industries with strict legal requirements, such as finance (e
Pros
- +g
- +Related to: data-privacy, security-compliance
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Voluntary Standards
Developers should learn and use voluntary standards to ensure compatibility, reduce technical debt, and enhance product reliability in collaborative or regulated environments
Pros
- +This is crucial when building interoperable systems (e
- +Related to: api-design, compliance
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
These tools serve different purposes. External Regulation is a concept while Voluntary Standards is a methodology. We picked External Regulation based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.
Based on overall popularity. External Regulation is more widely used, but Voluntary Standards excels in its own space.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev