Automated Security Scanning vs External Security Audits

Developers should use automated security scanning to integrate security into their DevOps workflows (DevSecOps), ensuring continuous security assessment throughout development and deployment meets developers should engage with external security audits when building or maintaining systems that handle sensitive data, require compliance (e. Here's our take.

Automated Security Scanning

Nice Pick

Developers should use automated security scanning to integrate security into their DevOps workflows (DevSecOps), ensuring continuous security assessment throughout development and deployment

Pros

• It is critical for compliance with standards like OWASP Top 10, PCI-DSS, or GDPR, and for preventing costly breaches in production environments by catching vulnerabilities in code, containers, APIs, or infrastructure as code (IaC)
• Related to: static-application-security-testing, dynamic-application-security-testing

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

External Security Audits

Developers should engage with external security audits when building or maintaining systems that handle sensitive data, require compliance (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: penetration-testing, vulnerability-assessment

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Automated Security Scanning is a tool while External Security Audits is a methodology. We picked Automated Security Scanning based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Automated Security Scanning wins

Based on overall popularity. Automated Security Scanning is more widely used, but External Security Audits excels in its own space.