Fauna DB vs MongoDB

Developers should learn and use Fauna DB when building applications that require a globally distributed, serverless database with strong consistency and transactional guarantees, such as real-time collaborative apps, e-commerce platforms, or financial services meets mongodb is widely used in the industry and worth learning. Here's our take.

Fauna DB

Nice Pick

Developers should learn and use Fauna DB when building applications that require a globally distributed, serverless database with strong consistency and transactional guarantees, such as real-time collaborative apps, e-commerce platforms, or financial services

Pros

• It's particularly valuable for teams that want to avoid managing database infrastructure while needing complex queries and relationships, as it provides a GraphQL API and FQL (Fauna Query Language) for flexible data access
• Related to: graphql, serverless-computing

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

MongoDB

MongoDB is widely used in the industry and worth learning

Pros

• Widely used in the industry
• Related to: mongoose, nodejs

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Fauna DB if: You want it's particularly valuable for teams that want to avoid managing database infrastructure while needing complex queries and relationships, as it provides a graphql api and fql (fauna query language) for flexible data access and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use MongoDB if: You prioritize widely used in the industry over what Fauna DB offers.

The Bottom Line

Fauna DB wins

Developers should learn and use Fauna DB when building applications that require a globally distributed, serverless database with strong consistency and transactional guarantees, such as real-time collaborative apps, e-commerce platforms, or financial services