File Based Storage vs Object Storage

Developers should learn and use File Based Storage for scenarios requiring simple, direct access to data without the overhead of a database, such as storing configuration files, logs, static assets (e meets developers should learn and use object storage when building applications that require scalable, cost-effective storage for large volumes of unstructured data, such as media hosting, big data analytics, or backup solutions. Here's our take.

File Based Storage

Nice Pick

Developers should learn and use File Based Storage for scenarios requiring simple, direct access to data without the overhead of a database, such as storing configuration files, logs, static assets (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: filesystem-api, json

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Object Storage

Developers should learn and use object storage when building applications that require scalable, cost-effective storage for large volumes of unstructured data, such as media hosting, big data analytics, or backup solutions

Pros

• It is particularly valuable in cloud environments and microservices architectures, where its API-driven access and high durability support distributed systems and disaster recovery scenarios
• Related to: amazon-s3, google-cloud-storage

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. File Based Storage is a concept while Object Storage is a platform. We picked File Based Storage based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

File Based Storage wins

Based on overall popularity. File Based Storage is more widely used, but Object Storage excels in its own space.