File System API vs Web SQL Database

Developers should learn the File System API when building web applications that require local file handling, such as photo editors, document processors, or offline-capable apps meets developers should learn web sql primarily for maintaining legacy web applications that still use it, as it was widely implemented in browsers like chrome and safari before being deprecated. Here's our take.

File System API

Nice Pick

Developers should learn the File System API when building web applications that require local file handling, such as photo editors, document processors, or offline-capable apps

Pros

• It's essential for scenarios where users need to save work locally, import/export files without cloud dependencies, or manage large datasets efficiently
• Related to: javascript, web-storage-api

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Web SQL Database

Developers should learn Web SQL primarily for maintaining legacy web applications that still use it, as it was widely implemented in browsers like Chrome and Safari before being deprecated

Pros

• It's useful for understanding client-side data storage evolution and for projects requiring simple, SQL-based local storage in older environments, though modern alternatives are recommended for new development
• Related to: indexeddb, localstorage

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. File System API is a platform while Web SQL Database is a database. We picked File System API based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

File System API wins

Based on overall popularity. File System API is more widely used, but Web SQL Database excels in its own space.