FingerprintManager vs Face Authentication

Developers should learn and use FingerprintManager when building Android apps that require secure user authentication, such as banking apps, password managers, or any application handling sensitive data meets developers should learn face authentication when building secure, user-friendly identity verification systems, such as for mobile apps, banking services, or physical security installations. Here's our take.

FingerprintManager

Nice Pick

Developers should learn and use FingerprintManager when building Android apps that require secure user authentication, such as banking apps, password managers, or any application handling sensitive data

Pros

• It provides a convenient and secure alternative to passwords or PINs, enhancing user experience by enabling quick and reliable biometric verification
• Related to: android-biometricprompt, android-keystore

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Face Authentication

Developers should learn face authentication when building secure, user-friendly identity verification systems, such as for mobile apps, banking services, or physical security installations

Pros

• It's particularly valuable in scenarios requiring hands-free or contactless authentication, like in healthcare settings or during the COVID-19 pandemic, where it reduces physical touchpoints and enhances hygiene
• Related to: computer-vision, machine-learning

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. FingerprintManager is a library while Face Authentication is a concept. We picked FingerprintManager based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

FingerprintManager wins

Based on overall popularity. FingerprintManager is more widely used, but Face Authentication excels in its own space.