Dynamic

Firebase vs Auth0

Google's all-in-one meets the identity-as-a-service darling that makes auth easy until you hit the enterprise pricing wall. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Firebase

Google's all-in-one. Fast to start, painful to leave.

Firebase

Nice Pick

Google's all-in-one. Fast to start, painful to leave.

Pros

  • +Mature ecosystem
  • +Great docs
  • +Fast prototyping
  • +Google scale

Cons

  • -Vendor lock-in
  • -NoSQL limits
  • -Pricing surprises
  • -Proprietary

Auth0

The identity-as-a-service darling that makes auth easy until you hit the enterprise pricing wall.

Pros

  • +Enterprise features
  • +Many integrations
  • +Mature
  • +Customizable
  • +Quick setup with pre-built login UIs and social logins
  • +Handles complex protocols like OAuth 2.0 and SAML out-of-the-box
  • +Scalable for startups to large applications with minimal dev effort

Cons

  • -Complex
  • -Expensive
  • -Overkill for small apps
  • -Pricing can skyrocket with user counts and advanced features
  • -Customization beyond basics often requires wrestling with their rules engine

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Firebase is a databases while Auth0 is a hosting & deployment. We picked Firebase based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Firebase wins

Based on overall popularity. Firebase is more widely used, but Auth0 excels in its own space.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev