Dynamic

Firebase vs AWS Amplify

Google's all-in-one meets aws's 'easy button' for full-stack apps that works great until you need to escape its walled garden. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Firebase

Google's all-in-one. Fast to start, painful to leave.

Firebase

Nice Pick

Google's all-in-one. Fast to start, painful to leave.

Pros

  • +Mature ecosystem
  • +Great docs
  • +Fast prototyping
  • +Google scale

Cons

  • -Vendor lock-in
  • -NoSQL limits
  • -Pricing surprises
  • -Proprietary

AWS Amplify

AWS's 'easy button' for full-stack apps that works great until you need to escape its walled garden.

Pros

  • +Tight integration with AWS services like Cognito, AppSync, and S3 out of the box
  • +CLI and UI that simplify deployment, hosting, and backend setup for React, Next.js, and other frameworks
  • +Built-in CI/CD pipelines and environment management for rapid prototyping
  • +Generous free tier for small projects and startups

Cons

  • -Vendor lock-in: migrating away from Amplify often requires rewriting chunks of your backend
  • -Limited customization for complex use cases—you'll hit walls if you need fine-grained control over infrastructure

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Firebase is a databases while AWS Amplify is a hosting & deployment. We picked Firebase based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Firebase wins

Based on overall popularity. Firebase is more widely used, but AWS Amplify excels in its own space.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev