Dynamic
Firebase vs AWS Amplify
Google's all-in-one meets aws's 'easy button' for full-stack apps that works great until you need to escape its walled garden. Here's our take.
🧊Nice Pick
Firebase
Google's all-in-one. Fast to start, painful to leave.
Firebase
Nice PickGoogle's all-in-one. Fast to start, painful to leave.
Pros
- +Mature ecosystem
- +Great docs
- +Fast prototyping
- +Google scale
Cons
- -Vendor lock-in
- -NoSQL limits
- -Pricing surprises
- -Proprietary
AWS Amplify
AWS's 'easy button' for full-stack apps that works great until you need to escape its walled garden.
Pros
- +Tight integration with AWS services like Cognito, AppSync, and S3 out of the box
- +CLI and UI that simplify deployment, hosting, and backend setup for React, Next.js, and other frameworks
- +Built-in CI/CD pipelines and environment management for rapid prototyping
- +Generous free tier for small projects and startups
Cons
- -Vendor lock-in: migrating away from Amplify often requires rewriting chunks of your backend
- -Limited customization for complex use cases—you'll hit walls if you need fine-grained control over infrastructure
The Verdict
These tools serve different purposes. Firebase is a databases while AWS Amplify is a hosting & deployment. We picked Firebase based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.
🧊
The Bottom Line
Firebase wins
Based on overall popularity. Firebase is more widely used, but AWS Amplify excels in its own space.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev