Dynamic
Firebase vs MongoDB
Google's all-in-one meets the database for when you want to store json and pretend it's a schema. Here's our take.
🧊Nice Pick
Firebase
Google's all-in-one. Fast to start, painful to leave.
Firebase
Nice PickGoogle's all-in-one. Fast to start, painful to leave.
Pros
- +Mature ecosystem
- +Great docs
- +Fast prototyping
- +Google scale
Cons
- -Vendor lock-in
- -NoSQL limits
- -Pricing surprises
- -Proprietary
MongoDB
The database for when you want to store JSON and pretend it's a schema.
Pros
- +Flexible schema allows rapid prototyping and iteration
- +Native JSON-like document storage fits well with modern web apps
- +Horizontal scaling with sharding is straightforward
- +Aggregation pipeline is powerful for complex queries
Cons
- -Lack of enforced schema can lead to messy data over time
- -Joins are clunky compared to relational databases
The Verdict
Use Firebase if: You want mature ecosystem and can live with vendor lock-in.
Use MongoDB if: You prioritize flexible schema allows rapid prototyping and iteration over what Firebase offers.
🧊
The Bottom Line
Firebase wins
Google's all-in-one. Fast to start, painful to leave.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev