Dynamic

Firebase vs MongoDB

Google's all-in-one meets the database for when you want to store json and pretend it's a schema. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Firebase

Google's all-in-one. Fast to start, painful to leave.

Firebase

Nice Pick

Google's all-in-one. Fast to start, painful to leave.

Pros

  • +Mature ecosystem
  • +Great docs
  • +Fast prototyping
  • +Google scale

Cons

  • -Vendor lock-in
  • -NoSQL limits
  • -Pricing surprises
  • -Proprietary

MongoDB

The database for when you want to store JSON and pretend it's a schema.

Pros

  • +Flexible schema allows rapid prototyping and iteration
  • +Native JSON-like document storage fits well with modern web apps
  • +Horizontal scaling with sharding is straightforward
  • +Aggregation pipeline is powerful for complex queries

Cons

  • -Lack of enforced schema can lead to messy data over time
  • -Joins are clunky compared to relational databases

The Verdict

Use Firebase if: You want mature ecosystem and can live with vendor lock-in.

Use MongoDB if: You prioritize flexible schema allows rapid prototyping and iteration over what Firebase offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Firebase wins

Google's all-in-one. Fast to start, painful to leave.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev