Fluid Templating vs Smarty

Developers should learn Fluid Templating when working with TYPO3 projects, as it is the default and recommended templating engine for building frontend views in this CMS, enabling clean and maintainable template code meets developers should learn smarty when building php-based web applications that require a clear separation between html/css and php code, such as content management systems, e-commerce platforms, or large-scale websites. Here's our take.

Fluid Templating

Nice Pick

Developers should learn Fluid Templating when working with TYPO3 projects, as it is the default and recommended templating engine for building frontend views in this CMS, enabling clean and maintainable template code

Pros

• It is particularly useful for creating complex, data-driven websites where separation of concerns and reusability are priorities, such as in enterprise-level applications or multilingual sites
• Related to: typo3, php

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Smarty

Developers should learn Smarty when building PHP-based web applications that require a clear separation between HTML/CSS and PHP code, such as content management systems, e-commerce platforms, or large-scale websites

Pros

• It is particularly useful for teams where front-end and back-end developers need to collaborate without interfering with each other's code, as it enforces a structured template approach
• Related to: php, twig

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Fluid Templating is a framework while Smarty is a template engine. We picked Fluid Templating based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Fluid Templating wins

Based on overall popularity. Fluid Templating is more widely used, but Smarty excels in its own space.