Freemarker vs Thymeleaf

Developers should learn Freemarker when building Java web applications that require server-side rendering of dynamic content, such as with Spring MVC or Apache Struts, as it integrates seamlessly and offers a clean separation of concerns meets developers should learn thymeleaf when building server-side rendered web applications with java, especially in spring-based projects, as it provides a clean separation of concerns and supports natural templating. Here's our take.

Freemarker

Nice Pick

Developers should learn Freemarker when building Java web applications that require server-side rendering of dynamic content, such as with Spring MVC or Apache Struts, as it integrates seamlessly and offers a clean separation of concerns

Pros

• It's also useful for generating emails, reports, or configuration files where template-based text generation is needed, providing a lightweight and efficient alternative to JSP for many use cases
• Related to: java, spring-mvc

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Thymeleaf

Developers should learn Thymeleaf when building server-side rendered web applications with Java, especially in Spring-based projects, as it provides a clean separation of concerns and supports natural templating

Pros

• It is ideal for use cases like generating dynamic HTML content, email templates, or reports where server-side processing is required, and it avoids the need for complex JavaScript frameworks for simple dynamic pages
• Related to: spring-framework, java

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Freemarker is a template engine while Thymeleaf is a library. We picked Freemarker based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Freemarker wins

Based on overall popularity. Freemarker is more widely used, but Thymeleaf excels in its own space.