Frequency Encoding vs Target Encoding
Developers should learn frequency encoding when working with categorical data in machine learning models, especially for tree-based algorithms like decision trees or gradient boosting, as it can improve model performance by reducing dimensionality compared to one-hot encoding meets developers should learn target encoding when working with categorical data that has many unique values (high cardinality), as traditional one-hot encoding can lead to sparse, high-dimensional datasets. Here's our take.
Frequency Encoding
Developers should learn frequency encoding when working with categorical data in machine learning models, especially for tree-based algorithms like decision trees or gradient boosting, as it can improve model performance by reducing dimensionality compared to one-hot encoding
Frequency Encoding
Nice PickDevelopers should learn frequency encoding when working with categorical data in machine learning models, especially for tree-based algorithms like decision trees or gradient boosting, as it can improve model performance by reducing dimensionality compared to one-hot encoding
Pros
- +It's ideal for datasets with many unique categories, such as zip codes or product IDs, where frequency might correlate with the target variable
- +Related to: feature-engineering, categorical-encoding
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Target Encoding
Developers should learn target encoding when working with categorical data that has many unique values (high cardinality), as traditional one-hot encoding can lead to sparse, high-dimensional datasets
Pros
- +It is especially useful in competitions like Kaggle or in production models for tabular data, such as predicting customer churn or sales, where it can capture meaningful patterns without excessive dimensionality
- +Related to: feature-engineering, categorical-encoding
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
Use Frequency Encoding if: You want it's ideal for datasets with many unique categories, such as zip codes or product ids, where frequency might correlate with the target variable and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.
Use Target Encoding if: You prioritize it is especially useful in competitions like kaggle or in production models for tabular data, such as predicting customer churn or sales, where it can capture meaningful patterns without excessive dimensionality over what Frequency Encoding offers.
Developers should learn frequency encoding when working with categorical data in machine learning models, especially for tree-based algorithms like decision trees or gradient boosting, as it can improve model performance by reducing dimensionality compared to one-hot encoding
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev