Dynamic

FTP vs SMTP

The granddaddy of file transfer, still kicking around like a stubborn old uncle who refuses to retire meets the ancient, reliable backbone of email that somehow still works despite being older than most developers. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

FTP

The granddaddy of file transfer, still kicking around like a stubborn old uncle who refuses to retire.

FTP

Nice Pick

The granddaddy of file transfer, still kicking around like a stubborn old uncle who refuses to retire.

Pros

  • +Widely supported across all platforms and systems
  • +Simple and straightforward for basic file transfers
  • +No fancy dependencies or setup required

Cons

  • -Transfers data in plain text, making it a security nightmare
  • -Requires separate control and data connections, which can be a hassle with firewalls

SMTP

The ancient, reliable backbone of email that somehow still works despite being older than most developers.

Pros

  • +Universally supported across all email systems
  • +Simple text-based protocol makes debugging straightforward
  • +Reliable for message transmission with built-in error handling

Cons

  • -No built-in encryption (requires TLS/SSL add-ons)
  • -Vulnerable to spam and spoofing without additional security layers

The Verdict

Use FTP if: You want widely supported across all platforms and systems and can live with transfers data in plain text, making it a security nightmare.

Use SMTP if: You prioritize universally supported across all email systems over what FTP offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
FTP wins

The granddaddy of file transfer, still kicking around like a stubborn old uncle who refuses to retire.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev