General Accessibility Standards vs Minimal Accessibility Practices
Developers should learn and apply these standards to comply with legal requirements (e meets developers should learn and use minimal accessibility practices to create inclusive digital experiences that are legally compliant (e. Here's our take.
General Accessibility Standards
Developers should learn and apply these standards to comply with legal requirements (e
General Accessibility Standards
Nice PickDevelopers should learn and apply these standards to comply with legal requirements (e
Pros
- +g
- +Related to: web-content-accessibility-guidelines, aria
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Minimal Accessibility Practices
Developers should learn and use Minimal Accessibility Practices to create inclusive digital experiences that are legally compliant (e
Pros
- +g
- +Related to: web-accessibility, wcag-compliance
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
These tools serve different purposes. General Accessibility Standards is a concept while Minimal Accessibility Practices is a methodology. We picked General Accessibility Standards based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.
Based on overall popularity. General Accessibility Standards is more widely used, but Minimal Accessibility Practices excels in its own space.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev