General Accessibility Standards vs No Formal Standards

Developers should learn and apply these standards to comply with legal requirements (e meets developers should consider this approach when working in fast-paced, innovative projects where requirements are unclear or rapidly changing, such as in early-stage startups, research and development, or prototyping phases. Here's our take.

General Accessibility Standards

Nice Pick

Developers should learn and apply these standards to comply with legal requirements (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: web-content-accessibility-guidelines, aria

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

No Formal Standards

Developers should consider this approach when working in fast-paced, innovative projects where requirements are unclear or rapidly changing, such as in early-stage startups, research and development, or prototyping phases

Pros

• It allows for creative problem-solving, reduces overhead from bureaucracy, and enables teams to pivot quickly based on feedback or new insights, though it requires strong communication and self-organization to avoid chaos
• Related to: agile-methodology, lean-development

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. General Accessibility Standards is a concept while No Formal Standards is a methodology. We picked General Accessibility Standards based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

General Accessibility Standards wins

Based on overall popularity. General Accessibility Standards is more widely used, but No Formal Standards excels in its own space.