Google Cloud Armor vs AWS WAF

Developers should use Google Cloud Armor when deploying applications on Google Cloud that require robust security against DDoS attacks and web vulnerabilities, such as for e-commerce sites, APIs, or web services handling sensitive data meets developers should use aws waf when deploying web applications on aws to enhance security against owasp top 10 threats, such as injection attacks and ddos attempts, especially for high-traffic or sensitive applications like e-commerce sites or apis. Here's our take.

Google Cloud Armor

Nice Pick

Developers should use Google Cloud Armor when deploying applications on Google Cloud that require robust security against DDoS attacks and web vulnerabilities, such as for e-commerce sites, APIs, or web services handling sensitive data

Pros

• It is essential for compliance with security standards like PCI DSS and for mitigating threats like SQL injection or cross-site scripting (XSS) in production environments
• Related to: google-cloud-platform, load-balancing

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

AWS WAF

Developers should use AWS WAF when deploying web applications on AWS to enhance security against OWASP Top 10 threats, such as injection attacks and DDoS attempts, especially for high-traffic or sensitive applications like e-commerce sites or APIs

Pros

• It is ideal for teams needing a scalable, managed firewall without maintaining infrastructure, and it complements AWS Shield for DDoS protection in cloud environments
• Related to: aws-cloudfront, aws-application-load-balancer

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Google Cloud Armor is a platform while AWS WAF is a tool. We picked Google Cloud Armor based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Google Cloud Armor wins

Based on overall popularity. Google Cloud Armor is more widely used, but AWS WAF excels in its own space.