Google Secret Manager vs Hashicorp Vault

Developers should use Google Secret Manager when building applications on Google Cloud that require secure handling of sensitive credentials, especially in cloud-native, microservices, or CI/CD environments meets developers should use vault when building applications that require secure handling of sensitive data, especially in cloud-native or microservices architectures where secrets management becomes complex. Here's our take.

Google Secret Manager

Nice Pick

Developers should use Google Secret Manager when building applications on Google Cloud that require secure handling of sensitive credentials, especially in cloud-native, microservices, or CI/CD environments

Pros

• It is essential for compliance with security best practices, enabling secrets rotation, and reducing the risk of exposure in code repositories or logs
• Related to: google-cloud-platform, kubernetes

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Hashicorp Vault

Developers should use Vault when building applications that require secure handling of sensitive data, especially in cloud-native or microservices architectures where secrets management becomes complex

Pros

• It is essential for compliance with security standards (e
• Related to: terraform, consul

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Google Secret Manager if: You want it is essential for compliance with security best practices, enabling secrets rotation, and reducing the risk of exposure in code repositories or logs and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Hashicorp Vault if: You prioritize it is essential for compliance with security standards (e over what Google Secret Manager offers.

The Bottom Line

Google Secret Manager wins

Developers should use Google Secret Manager when building applications on Google Cloud that require secure handling of sensitive credentials, especially in cloud-native, microservices, or CI/CD environments