GraphQL.js vs gRPC
Developers should learn GraphQL meets developers should learn grpc when building microservices architectures, real-time applications, or systems requiring low-latency, high-throughput communication, such as in cloud-native environments or iot platforms. Here's our take.
GraphQL.js
Developers should learn GraphQL
GraphQL.js
Nice PickDevelopers should learn GraphQL
Pros
- +js when building APIs that require flexible data retrieval, such as in modern web or mobile applications where clients need to request specific data fields to avoid over-fetching
- +Related to: graphql, node-js
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
gRPC
Developers should learn gRPC when building microservices architectures, real-time applications, or systems requiring low-latency, high-throughput communication, such as in cloud-native environments or IoT platforms
Pros
- +It is particularly useful for polyglot systems where services are written in different languages, as it provides language-agnostic contracts via protobuf
- +Related to: protocol-buffers, http-2
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
These tools serve different purposes. GraphQL.js is a library while gRPC is a framework. We picked GraphQL.js based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.
Based on overall popularity. GraphQL.js is more widely used, but gRPC excels in its own space.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev