GraphQL Subscriptions vs Socket.IO

Developers should use GraphQL Subscriptions when building applications that require real-time functionality, such as messaging apps, live dashboards, or multiplayer games, to avoid inefficient polling and reduce latency meets developers should use socket. Here's our take.

GraphQL Subscriptions

Nice Pick

Developers should use GraphQL Subscriptions when building applications that require real-time functionality, such as messaging apps, live dashboards, or multiplayer games, to avoid inefficient polling and reduce latency

Pros

• They are essential in scenarios where data changes frequently and clients need instant updates without manual refreshes, enhancing user experience and system efficiency
• Related to: graphql, apollo-server

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Socket.IO

Developers should use Socket

Pros

• IO when building applications that require low-latency, real-time data exchange, such as chat systems, live dashboards, multiplayer games, or collaborative editing tools
• Related to: javascript, node-js

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. GraphQL Subscriptions is a concept while Socket.IO is a library. We picked GraphQL Subscriptions based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

GraphQL Subscriptions wins

Based on overall popularity. GraphQL Subscriptions is more widely used, but Socket.IO excels in its own space.