Dynamic

GraphQL vs tRPC

The over-engineered query language that makes REST look like a toddler's scribble meets typescript's love letter to api developers. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

GraphQL

The over-engineered query language that makes REST look like a toddler's scribble.

GraphQL

Nice Pick

The over-engineered query language that makes REST look like a toddler's scribble.

Pros

  • +Eliminates over-fetching and under-fetching with precise data queries
  • +Strongly typed schema ensures API consistency and reduces errors
  • +Aggregates data from multiple sources in a single request for efficiency

Cons

  • -Complex setup and learning curve compared to REST
  • -Can lead to performance issues with deeply nested queries

tRPC

TypeScript's love letter to API developers. Write types once, cry about mismatched schemas never.

Pros

  • +End-to-end type safety without code generation
  • +Seamless autocompletion and real-time error prevention
  • +Reduces boilerplate by sharing types between client and server

Cons

  • -Tightly coupled to TypeScript, limiting use in non-TypeScript projects
  • -Can feel like magic, making debugging more opaque when things go wrong

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. GraphQL is a devtools while tRPC is a ai coding tools. We picked GraphQL based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

🧊
The Bottom Line
GraphQL wins

Based on overall popularity. GraphQL is more widely used, but tRPC excels in its own space.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev