Dynamic
GraphQL vs tRPC
The over-engineered query language that makes REST look like a toddler's scribble meets typescript's love letter to api developers. Here's our take.
🧊Nice Pick
GraphQL
The over-engineered query language that makes REST look like a toddler's scribble.
GraphQL
Nice PickThe over-engineered query language that makes REST look like a toddler's scribble.
Pros
- +Eliminates over-fetching and under-fetching with precise data queries
- +Strongly typed schema ensures API consistency and reduces errors
- +Aggregates data from multiple sources in a single request for efficiency
Cons
- -Complex setup and learning curve compared to REST
- -Can lead to performance issues with deeply nested queries
tRPC
TypeScript's love letter to API developers. Write types once, cry about mismatched schemas never.
Pros
- +End-to-end type safety without code generation
- +Seamless autocompletion and real-time error prevention
- +Reduces boilerplate by sharing types between client and server
Cons
- -Tightly coupled to TypeScript, limiting use in non-TypeScript projects
- -Can feel like magic, making debugging more opaque when things go wrong
The Verdict
These tools serve different purposes. GraphQL is a devtools while tRPC is a ai coding tools. We picked GraphQL based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.
🧊
The Bottom Line
GraphQL wins
Based on overall popularity. GraphQL is more widely used, but tRPC excels in its own space.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev