Dynamic

gRPC vs REST API

The microservices whisperer: blazing fast, but good luck debugging that binary blob meets the old reliable of web apis. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

REST API

The old reliable of web APIs. Simple enough to get you started, but good luck with those nested resources.

gRPC

The microservices whisperer: blazing fast, but good luck debugging that binary blob.

Pros

  • +High-performance with HTTP/2 and Protocol Buffers
  • +Built-in support for streaming and load balancing
  • +Strong typing and code generation across multiple languages

Cons

  • -Binary payloads make debugging a nightmare
  • -Steep learning curve for Protocol Buffers and HTTP/2 quirks

REST API

Nice Pick

The old reliable of web APIs. Simple enough to get you started, but good luck with those nested resources.

Pros

  • +Easy to understand with standard HTTP methods
  • +Stateless design simplifies scaling
  • +Wide tooling and community support

Cons

  • -Over-fetching and under-fetching data is common
  • -Versioning can get messy fast

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. gRPC is a frameworks while REST API is a apis. We picked REST API based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

🧊
The Bottom Line
REST API wins

Based on overall popularity. REST API is more widely used, but gRPC excels in its own space.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev