HAL vs Bare Metal Programming

Developers should learn HAL when working on embedded systems projects that require hardware portability, as it allows code to be reused across multiple microcontroller families (e meets developers should learn bare metal programming when working on embedded systems, iot devices, or real-time applications where resource constraints, deterministic timing, or direct hardware access are required. Here's our take.

HAL

Nice Pick

Developers should learn HAL when working on embedded systems projects that require hardware portability, as it allows code to be reused across multiple microcontroller families (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: embedded-systems, microcontrollers

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Bare Metal Programming

Developers should learn bare metal programming when working on embedded systems, IoT devices, or real-time applications where resource constraints, deterministic timing, or direct hardware access are required

Pros

• It's essential for firmware development, bootloader creation, and scenarios where an OS would introduce unacceptable latency or overhead, such as in automotive control systems or medical devices
• Related to: c-programming, assembly-language

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. HAL is a library while Bare Metal Programming is a concept. We picked HAL based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

HAL wins

Based on overall popularity. HAL is more widely used, but Bare Metal Programming excels in its own space.