Hard Coding vs Soft Coding
Developers should avoid hard coding in most scenarios, as it leads to brittle code that is difficult to update and test meets developers should use soft coding when building applications that require frequent configuration updates, need to adapt to different environments (e. Here's our take.
Hard Coding
Developers should avoid hard coding in most scenarios, as it leads to brittle code that is difficult to update and test
Hard Coding
Nice PickDevelopers should avoid hard coding in most scenarios, as it leads to brittle code that is difficult to update and test
Pros
- +However, it might be used temporarily for prototyping, debugging, or in simple scripts where configurability is not a priority
- +Related to: configuration-management, environment-variables
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Soft Coding
Developers should use soft coding when building applications that require frequent configuration updates, need to adapt to different environments (e
Pros
- +g
- +Related to: configuration-management, environment-variables
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
These tools serve different purposes. Hard Coding is a concept while Soft Coding is a methodology. We picked Hard Coding based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.
Based on overall popularity. Hard Coding is more widely used, but Soft Coding excels in its own space.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev