Hasura vs Apollo Server

Developers should use Hasura when they need to rapidly prototype or build applications with GraphQL APIs, especially for projects requiring real-time features like live queries or subscriptions meets developers should learn apollo server when building graphql apis for web or mobile applications, as it simplifies server-side implementation with built-in best practices and tooling. Here's our take.

Hasura

Nice Pick

Developers should use Hasura when they need to rapidly prototype or build applications with GraphQL APIs, especially for projects requiring real-time features like live queries or subscriptions

Pros

• It's ideal for startups, MVPs, or teams looking to accelerate development by leveraging existing PostgreSQL databases without extensive backend coding
• Related to: graphql, postgresql

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Apollo Server

Developers should learn Apollo Server when building GraphQL APIs for web or mobile applications, as it simplifies server-side implementation with built-in best practices and tooling

Pros

• It is particularly useful in scenarios requiring flexible data fetching, such as aggregating data from multiple microservices or databases, or when real-time updates via subscriptions are needed
• Related to: graphql, node-js

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Hasura is a platform while Apollo Server is a framework. We picked Hasura based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Hasura wins

Based on overall popularity. Hasura is more widely used, but Apollo Server excels in its own space.