Hasura vs PostGraphile

Developers should use Hasura when they need to rapidly prototype or build applications with GraphQL APIs, especially for projects requiring real-time features like live queries or subscriptions meets developers should use postgraphile when they need to rapidly prototype or build a graphql api for a postgresql-based application, as it reduces boilerplate code and ensures the api stays in sync with the database. Here's our take.

Hasura

Nice Pick

Developers should use Hasura when they need to rapidly prototype or build applications with GraphQL APIs, especially for projects requiring real-time features like live queries or subscriptions

Pros

• It's ideal for startups, MVPs, or teams looking to accelerate development by leveraging existing PostgreSQL databases without extensive backend coding
• Related to: graphql, postgresql

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

PostGraphile

Developers should use PostGraphile when they need to rapidly prototype or build a GraphQL API for a PostgreSQL-based application, as it reduces boilerplate code and ensures the API stays in sync with the database

Pros

• It is particularly useful for projects where the database schema is the primary source of truth, such as in data-intensive applications or when leveraging PostgreSQL's advanced features like row-level security and stored procedures
• Related to: graphql, postgresql

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Hasura is a platform while PostGraphile is a tool. We picked Hasura based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Hasura wins

Based on overall popularity. Hasura is more widely used, but PostGraphile excels in its own space.