Dynamic

Headless CMS vs Joomla

Developers should use a headless CMS when building modern web applications, mobile apps, or omnichannel experiences that require content to be delivered to multiple frontends (e meets developers should learn joomla when building medium to large-scale websites that require robust content management, extensibility through extensions, and a balance between ease of use and customization. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Headless CMS

Developers should use a headless CMS when building modern web applications, mobile apps, or omnichannel experiences that require content to be delivered to multiple frontends (e

Headless CMS

Nice Pick

Developers should use a headless CMS when building modern web applications, mobile apps, or omnichannel experiences that require content to be delivered to multiple frontends (e

Pros

  • +g
  • +Related to: contentful, strapi

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Joomla

Developers should learn Joomla when building medium to large-scale websites that require robust content management, extensibility through extensions, and a balance between ease of use and customization

Pros

  • +It is particularly useful for projects like business websites, online magazines, or membership sites where administrators need a powerful backend without deep coding knowledge
  • +Related to: php, mysql

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Headless CMS if: You want g and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Joomla if: You prioritize it is particularly useful for projects like business websites, online magazines, or membership sites where administrators need a powerful backend without deep coding knowledge over what Headless CMS offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Headless CMS wins

Developers should use a headless CMS when building modern web applications, mobile apps, or omnichannel experiences that require content to be delivered to multiple frontends (e

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev