Headless CMS vs Joomla
Developers should use a headless CMS when building modern web applications, mobile apps, or omnichannel experiences that require content to be delivered to multiple frontends (e meets developers should learn joomla when building medium to large-scale websites that require robust content management, extensibility through extensions, and a balance between ease of use and customization. Here's our take.
Headless CMS
Developers should use a headless CMS when building modern web applications, mobile apps, or omnichannel experiences that require content to be delivered to multiple frontends (e
Headless CMS
Nice PickDevelopers should use a headless CMS when building modern web applications, mobile apps, or omnichannel experiences that require content to be delivered to multiple frontends (e
Pros
- +g
- +Related to: contentful, strapi
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Joomla
Developers should learn Joomla when building medium to large-scale websites that require robust content management, extensibility through extensions, and a balance between ease of use and customization
Pros
- +It is particularly useful for projects like business websites, online magazines, or membership sites where administrators need a powerful backend without deep coding knowledge
- +Related to: php, mysql
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
Use Headless CMS if: You want g and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.
Use Joomla if: You prioritize it is particularly useful for projects like business websites, online magazines, or membership sites where administrators need a powerful backend without deep coding knowledge over what Headless CMS offers.
Developers should use a headless CMS when building modern web applications, mobile apps, or omnichannel experiences that require content to be delivered to multiple frontends (e
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev