Health Information Networks vs Blockchain

Developers should learn about Health Information Networks when working in healthcare technology, as they are essential for building applications that comply with regulations like HIPAA and support data exchange standards such as HL7 FHIR meets developers should learn blockchain for healthcare to build applications that address critical issues like data interoperability, patient privacy, and fraud prevention. Here's our take.

Health Information Networks

Nice Pick

Developers should learn about Health Information Networks when working in healthcare technology, as they are essential for building applications that comply with regulations like HIPAA and support data exchange standards such as HL7 FHIR

Pros

• Use cases include developing electronic health record (EHR) integrations, patient portals, telehealth platforms, and analytics tools that require access to aggregated health data from multiple sources
• Related to: hl7-fhir, healthcare-interoperability

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Blockchain

Developers should learn blockchain for healthcare to build applications that address critical issues like data interoperability, patient privacy, and fraud prevention

Pros

• Specific use cases include electronic health record (EHR) systems for secure patient data exchange, supply chain tracking for pharmaceuticals to combat counterfeits, and clinical trial management for transparent data sharing
• Related to: smart-contracts, cryptography

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Health Information Networks is a platform while Blockchain is a concept. We picked Health Information Networks based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Health Information Networks wins

Based on overall popularity. Health Information Networks is more widely used, but Blockchain excels in its own space.