Dynamic

High Availability vs Low Availability Design

Developers should learn and implement High Availability when building systems that require minimal downtime, such as e-commerce platforms, financial services, healthcare applications, or critical infrastructure meets developers should consider low availability design when building systems where high availability is not a priority, such as internal dashboards, batch processing jobs, or prototypes, to reduce complexity and infrastructure costs. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

High Availability

Developers should learn and implement High Availability when building systems that require minimal downtime, such as e-commerce platforms, financial services, healthcare applications, or critical infrastructure

High Availability

Nice Pick

Developers should learn and implement High Availability when building systems that require minimal downtime, such as e-commerce platforms, financial services, healthcare applications, or critical infrastructure

Pros

  • +It is essential for ensuring business continuity, meeting service-level agreements (SLAs), and providing reliable user experiences, especially in cloud-native, distributed, or mission-critical applications where failures can have severe consequences
  • +Related to: load-balancing, failover-clustering

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Low Availability Design

Developers should consider Low Availability Design when building systems where high availability is not a priority, such as internal dashboards, batch processing jobs, or prototypes, to reduce complexity and infrastructure costs

Pros

  • +It is particularly useful in cost-sensitive projects, rapid development cycles, or when dealing with legacy systems where achieving high availability would be prohibitively expensive
  • +Related to: high-availability, fault-tolerance

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use High Availability if: You want it is essential for ensuring business continuity, meeting service-level agreements (slas), and providing reliable user experiences, especially in cloud-native, distributed, or mission-critical applications where failures can have severe consequences and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Low Availability Design if: You prioritize it is particularly useful in cost-sensitive projects, rapid development cycles, or when dealing with legacy systems where achieving high availability would be prohibitively expensive over what High Availability offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
High Availability wins

Developers should learn and implement High Availability when building systems that require minimal downtime, such as e-commerce platforms, financial services, healthcare applications, or critical infrastructure

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev