Dynamic

Hoisting vs Strict Mode

Developers should learn hoisting to write predictable JavaScript code and debug issues related to variable scope and temporal dead zones meets developers should use strict mode in javascript to enhance code reliability and maintainability, especially in modern web applications and large codebases. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Hoisting

Developers should learn hoisting to write predictable JavaScript code and debug issues related to variable scope and temporal dead zones

Hoisting

Nice Pick

Developers should learn hoisting to write predictable JavaScript code and debug issues related to variable scope and temporal dead zones

Pros

  • +It's essential when working with var, let, const, and function declarations, as it explains why code like 'console
  • +Related to: javascript, scope

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Strict Mode

Developers should use Strict Mode in JavaScript to enhance code reliability and maintainability, especially in modern web applications and large codebases

Pros

  • +It is essential for catching bugs early, such as accidental global variable creation, and for preparing code for future ECMAScript standards
  • +Related to: javascript, ecmascript

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Hoisting if: You want it's essential when working with var, let, const, and function declarations, as it explains why code like 'console and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Strict Mode if: You prioritize it is essential for catching bugs early, such as accidental global variable creation, and for preparing code for future ecmascript standards over what Hoisting offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Hoisting wins

Developers should learn hoisting to write predictable JavaScript code and debug issues related to variable scope and temporal dead zones

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev