Hoisting vs Strict Mode
Developers should learn hoisting to write predictable JavaScript code and debug issues related to variable scope and temporal dead zones meets developers should use strict mode in javascript to enhance code reliability and maintainability, especially in modern web applications and large codebases. Here's our take.
Hoisting
Developers should learn hoisting to write predictable JavaScript code and debug issues related to variable scope and temporal dead zones
Hoisting
Nice PickDevelopers should learn hoisting to write predictable JavaScript code and debug issues related to variable scope and temporal dead zones
Pros
- +It's essential when working with var, let, const, and function declarations, as it explains why code like 'console
- +Related to: javascript, scope
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Strict Mode
Developers should use Strict Mode in JavaScript to enhance code reliability and maintainability, especially in modern web applications and large codebases
Pros
- +It is essential for catching bugs early, such as accidental global variable creation, and for preparing code for future ECMAScript standards
- +Related to: javascript, ecmascript
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
Use Hoisting if: You want it's essential when working with var, let, const, and function declarations, as it explains why code like 'console and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.
Use Strict Mode if: You prioritize it is essential for catching bugs early, such as accidental global variable creation, and for preparing code for future ecmascript standards over what Hoisting offers.
Developers should learn hoisting to write predictable JavaScript code and debug issues related to variable scope and temporal dead zones
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev