.htaccess vs Caddy

Developers should learn meets developers should learn caddy for its ease of use in deploying secure web applications, as it automates https configuration and reduces manual ssl certificate management. Here's our take.

.htaccess

Nice Pick

Developers should learn

Pros

• htaccess when working with Apache-based hosting environments, such as shared hosting or self-managed servers, to implement security measures, SEO-friendly URLs, or site-specific rules
• Related to: apache-web-server, url-rewriting

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Caddy

Developers should learn Caddy for its ease of use in deploying secure web applications, as it automates HTTPS configuration and reduces manual SSL certificate management

Pros

• It is ideal for small to medium projects, microservices architectures, and scenarios requiring quick setup with robust security defaults, such as static site hosting or API proxying
• Related to: go, web-server

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use .htaccess if: You want htaccess when working with apache-based hosting environments, such as shared hosting or self-managed servers, to implement security measures, seo-friendly urls, or site-specific rules and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Caddy if: You prioritize it is ideal for small to medium projects, microservices architectures, and scenarios requiring quick setup with robust security defaults, such as static site hosting or api proxying over what .htaccess offers.

The Bottom Line

.htaccess wins

Developers should learn