HTML vs Markdown
The web's skeleton—without it, everything's just a blob of text and broken dreams meets the lazy developer's best friend. Here's our take.
HTML
The web's skeleton—without it, everything's just a blob of text and broken dreams.
HTML
Nice PickThe web's skeleton—without it, everything's just a blob of text and broken dreams.
Pros
- +Universal browser support means it just works everywhere
- +Simple syntax that's easy to learn for beginners
- +Essential foundation for all web development
- +Semantic elements improve accessibility and SEO
Cons
- -Can get messy and unreadable without proper formatting
- -Limited interactivity on its own—needs JavaScript for anything fun
Markdown
The lazy developer's best friend. Write docs without touching HTML, but good luck with complex layouts.
Pros
- +Dead simple syntax that anyone can learn in minutes
- +Widely supported across platforms like GitHub and static site generators
- +Plain text format makes it version-control friendly
Cons
- -Limited formatting options—good luck with tables or advanced styling
- -Inconsistent implementations across tools can cause headaches
The Verdict
Use HTML if: You want universal browser support means it just works everywhere and can live with can get messy and unreadable without proper formatting.
Use Markdown if: You prioritize dead simple syntax that anyone can learn in minutes over what HTML offers.
The web's skeleton—without it, everything's just a blob of text and broken dreams.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev